Wednesday, March 05, 2014

Burlington voters opt to give up gun rights, gut state preemption

Gun owners nationwide should not dismiss this as a purely local matter -- the tactics involved, using a "home rule" facade to establish a patchwork quilt of impossible to comply with restrictions, is one that gun-banners attempt wherever they can. [More]
Today's Gun Rights Examiner report notes a symbolic loss for freedom.  It symbolizes collectivist willingness to play the long game and take their incremental gains where they can. It symbolizes the first steps on the road to totalitarianism.

Knowing the Score

But we are not going to allow the confirmation of this anti-gun crazy without a fight. And Gun Owners of America will score a vote in favor of Murthy as an anti-gun vote. [More
That beats NOT knowing the score.

Wouldn't you agree, NRA?

Why no confirmation after five days to anyone but Emily?

Looks like it's time for another one of these.

AFTER I do what GOA asks and contact my senators.

There.

THAT was easy.

UPDATE: And so was this:

With "Republicans" Like Mark Jacobs...

...who needs Democrats? [More]

Yes, but how is he on guns?

You tell me.

The fact that it's so hard to find out  tells me all I need to know.  The fact that it's not even a listed issue on his campaign site doesn't help.

I'd love to have him surprise me.

Why not just ask him?

OK:

And don't forget Facebook and Twitter.

What an interesting warning about the "Honour Team" reply:


How come they spell like Brits?

It's Not (Just) About Guns

The MILMs demand controlling everything. [More]

Don't these gals have some shopping to do?

Or maybe take the kids out for a nice drive to the beach?

The thought occurs--the most prolific killers of children in this country are Demanding Moms.

Remember, with "progressives," every day is Opposite Day.

The One Group We Can ALL Discriminate Against

Gun owners appear to be the only group against whom it is still fashionable to practice social prejudice.  [More]

I guess this scratches my plan to go to a "progressive" bakery and ask for this cake...   

I wonder how proudly they'll participate if someone ignores their stupid sticker?

Read the Fine Print

This site is a satire of the current state of Law Enforcement, Fire Fighting and Emergency Medical work. Stories posted here are not real and you should not assume them to have any basis in any real fact. [More]
Those of you spreading this, go back and undo what you have done. We have real issues requiring our attention.

[Via several of you]

Dazed and Confused

If they can't even go to the store without falling apart, why would we trust them with influencing gun policy? [More]

Hey, if you're going to go read the whole article, here's a little background music.

We're the Fauxnly Ones Flashing Enough

Officers think the ATF inspector hoped that his employee badge would fool them when he flashed it at them and said, “That was my badge.” [More]
Thank goodness. When I read "ATF inspector," I was afraid he flashed something else.

And it's not the first time?

Now that we have reason to believe the guy is an habitual deceiver who has no compunctions against using his position to influence official investigations in order to advance his personal interests, doesn't that make every finding he's ever written up against an FFL suspect?

At what point do we dismiss everything he claims, and assume we're just not going to get the truth from him about anything?



These are the Domestic Enemies the Founders Warned Us Against

Trapped in her own lies, the leader of the "swarms of officers" clams up. [More]

While Old Bloody Hands runs interference, as usual.

This Day in History: March 5

Captain McLane having informed me that he and some of the Officers who acted under him have had suits brought against them for the seizure of Horses and sundry Articles of provisions near the lines of the Enemy while they had possession of this City. [More]